A customer books a car on the Grab application
If the proposal goes ahead, companies like Grab, Uber and GoViet will be managed as a separate entity from traditional taxi firms.
Nguyễn Mạnh Hùng, minister of Information and Communications, has submitted a proposal to Prime Minister Nguyễn Xuân Phúc on the issue, Đầu Tư (Investment) newspaper reported.
The draft decree on automobile transportation businesses would replace Decree 86/2014/NĐ-CP, which the Ministry of Transport recently submitted to the Government.
The latest draft, the eighth since 2016, includes a new definition for automobile transportation businesses, defining them as a service which includes two major stages: vehicle operation and service fee fixing.
With this definition, any firms involved in vehicle operation and price fixing must be registered as transportation companies, meaning Grab would be a transportation company and managed like taxi firms.
However, the MIC said countries such as the UK, Germany, Singapore and Indonesia have used new management models to aid the development of digital technologies to bring new benefits to society, especially heightened competition.
In Việt Nam, the Government and PM has instructed ministries and agencies to build new legal frameworks to promote innovation.
From that point of view, the ministry said it was necessary to see firms like Grab, Uber and GoViet as a separate entity, in addition to those currently regulated.
For traditional taxi operation, the ministry currently sees three stakeholders, namely taxi firms, consumers and the State. Under the draft, ride-hailing platforms would be the fourth entity.
Hùng said the benefits brought by the new business model were clear, including transparency in transport costs and higher quality service.
The ministry proposed suitable management regulations, including use of technology by the State. Instead of requiring cars providing ride-hailing services to have roof signs showing that they were “contract vehicles”, agencies may request they ensure access to data of vehicles using their platform.
The ministry confirmed it was necessary to increase competitiveness with traditional taxi models, and ride-hailing platforms would be one way to go about this.
- These ride-hailing startups want to run your life
- Uber lost nearly $1 billion last quarter as the ride-hailing giant’s growth slows
- On Eve of Uber's IPO, Ride-Hail Drivers Stage Protests
- Here are the biggest differences between Uber and Lyft, the two biggest ride-hailing apps
- Surprise! Uber and Lyft Don’t Like NYC’s New Ride-Hail Rules
- Go-Jek’s expansion hits roadblock as Philippines rejects ride-hailing application
- SoftBank Nearing $500 Million Investment In Ride-Hailing Firm Grab: Sources
- Uber is suing to block New York’s cap on new ride-hailing vehicles
- Uber has kicked off its IPO road show. Here’s where the ride-hailing giant’s executives and bankers are heading to court investors.
- Spain in talks with cabs protesting ride-hailing services